by Jennifer R
The article talks about how database management was used to provide a solution for a medical practice seeking to update its technology usage, improve its efficiency and patient care. The author described the medical practice, consisting of 4 physicians and 55 workers, who for three decades did a majority of the communication via faxing and hand-carrying information. He goes on to point out the practice “lacked e-mail and an intranet, and had no system to centrally manage technology, data storage, or security.” A lot of the work was done on paper and transcribed onto the computer. The solution was implemented by a consulting firm, itSynergy, who “established a Microsoft Windows Small Business Server-based network as a wide area network.” They also installed a server at each of the three offices that runs Microsoft Windows Server 2003 and Microsoft SQL Server 2005. The medical practice now uses gloEMR, a electronic medical records management software, to update and manage patient records. It cut down the cost of transcribing medical records and improved communication within the practice.
I found it surprising that there are still businesses and practices out there that don’t use electronic databases to manage their information. I know it can be costly for businesses to overhaul their old systems, especially if there are compatibility issues. There is also the cost of training personnel and maintenance, like we discussed in class. Despite this, there is a growing list of tasks that, once manually carried out, are now completed through electronic means. It makes me curious about the reasons some businesses are still reluctant to convert an electronic database.
Source: Cocanower, M. (2010) Going Digital Saves Medical Practice Money, Improves Patient Care. PCWorld. Retrieved May 6, 2012 from http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/197951/going_digital_saves_medical_practice_money_improves_patient_care.html#tk.mod_stln